<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
<HTML LANG="en-US"><HEAD>
<TITLE>META Tag Snob: The Useless META Tags</TITLE>
<base href="http://www.bauser.com/websnob/meta/useless.html">
<META NAME="description" CONTENT="A list of all the completely useless META
tag values I've encountered.">
<meta name="keywords" content="meta tags">  
<meta name="DCTERMS.created" scheme="DCTERMS.W3CDTF" content="2002-05-25">
<!--#exec cgi="../cgi/head.pl"-->
<script src="pop.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
</HEAD><BODY BGCOLOR="#000000" TEXT="#00FF00" LINK="#0000FF" VLINK="#FF00FF">

<p id="breadcrumbs"><a href="/websnob/" rel="Start">Websnob</a> &gt;
<a href="/websnob/meta/">META Tags</a> &gt;
<strong>Useless Tags</strong></p>

<p class="advert"><!--#exec cgi="../adverts/ad_1.pl"--></p>

<h1>Useless Tags</h1>

<p>Although <code>META</code> tags can be useful for giving instructions to
search engines and web browsers, not all of them are so useful. In fact,
quite a few are <em>completely useless</em>. The useless tags (listed here
for completeness) are usually created by overly-pretentious authoring
software adding <code>META</code> tags just to impress the user.</p>

<p>If you add any of these tags to your web pages, I will mock you without
hesitation or mercy.</p>

<p>Some of these tags are <q>mystery</q> tags spotted on high-profile sites
like <a href="http://ibm.com/">IBM</a>. Most of those tags are probably for
use with proprietary authoring or indexing systems, and therefore useless
to anybody else. They're only mentioned here for the sake of completeness
and rumor-control.</p> 

<h2 id="abstract">name="Abstract"</h2>

<p>This tag is almost an urban legend. Seriously. There are <a
href="http://www.google.com/search?q=name%3Dabstract+meta">hundreds of
pages recommending name="abstract" listed in Google</a>, but not a single
damn one of them can name a search engine that uses <var>Abstract</var>. So
far as I can tell, the only public engine using <var>Abstract</var> is <a
href="proprietary.html#Fireball">Fireball.de</a>, who accept it as a
synonym for <var><a href="engines.html#Description">Description</a></var>. Obviously,
you're better off just using <var>Description</var>, since that's what all
the other engines read.</p>

<p><var>Abstract</var> also shows up in the source code of many pages
authored by IBM, suggesting it's used internally there. I suspect the usage
by IBM was combined with somebody's wishful thinking and transformed into
pseudo-fact by dimwitted web advisors who copy-and-paste their advice from
each others' sites.</p>

<p>I'm serious about the copy-and-paste accusation. I've seen countless
cases (like <a href=
"http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Although+search+engines+do+not+as+often+use+this+tag%22"
>this one</a>) of sites "borrowing" the same
inaccurate information. It's pathetic. (Even more pathetic is the fact that
those sites think an abstract is "a one line sentence". Clearly some people
have never <em>seen</em> an abstract in print.)</p> 

<p>Reference: none</p>

<h2 id="AML">name="Agent markup Language Version"</h2>

<p>This tag was used by the Agent Markup Language, a semantic markup system
for web pages that was never widely used. <code>Content</code> is a string
identifying which version of the language was used to markup the tagged page.</p> 

<p>Reference: <a href=
"http://web.archive.org/web/20000819151853/http://arti.vub.ac.be/~as/aml/aml.htm"
>AML Agent Markup Language (via the Wayback Machine)</a>

<h2 id="author">name="Author"</h2>

<p>I'm pretty sure this one is useless, but at least two search engines say
otherwise, so I've moved discussion of <var>Author</var> to the page about <a
href="engines.html">META tags for search engines</a>.

<p>Reference: <a href=
"http://wp.netscape.com/eng/mozilla/Gold/authoring/create.htm#1006152"
>Navigator Gold Authoring Guide</a></p>

<h2 id="Classification">name="Classification"</h2>

<p>Apparently introduced in the authoring tool of Netscape Navigator Gold,
this tag was meant to categorize a page for indexing by a <a
href="http://developer.netscape.com/docs/manuals/compass.html">Netscape
Catalog Server</a>. Since I'm apparently the only person who ever found
that explanation in the documentation for Navigator Gold, most people have
used <var>Classification</var> as a synonym for <var><a
href="engines.html#Keywords">Keywords</a></var> (as <a
href="http://www.godaddy.com/gdshop/websitecomplete.asp">WebSite
Complete</a> does), or ignored it all together. <a
href="proprietary.html#Gigablast">Gigablast started using
<var>Classification</var> in 2003</a>, but hasn't explained their
implementation of it very well.</p>

<p>Reference: <a href=
"http://wp.netscape.com/eng/mozilla/Gold/authoring/create.htm#1006152"
>Navigator Gold Authoring Guide</a></p>

<h2 id="Copyright">name="Copyright"</h2>

<p>This implementation of the <code>META</code> tag is used by pretentious
software (and pretentious authors) to identify the copyright holder for the
tagged page. <strong>I hate this tag.</strong> It's a waste of space,
people. It's redundant if you're in a Berne Convention nation, and probably
useless if you're not, since it's invisible to normal users. If you want to
put a copyright statement on your page, put it in the
<code>BODY</code>.</p> 

<p>Reference: none</p>

<h2 id="CreatedAppVer">name="CreatedAppVer"</h2>

<p>Used by WebSite Complete for something, but I'll be damned if I know
what.</p>

<p>Reference: none</p>

<h2 id="Division">name="Division"</h2>

<p>This tag was used by <a
href="http://www.state.ak.us/local/akpages/ENV.CONSERV/home.htm">Alaska
Department of Environmental Conservation</a> to identify which department
division was responsible for the tagged page. They seem to have stopped
using this tag.</p>

<p>Reference: <a
href="http://www.state.ak.us/dec/das/is/webcord/htmstand.htm">DRAFT
Standards for web documents on DEC's website</a></p> 

<h2 id="EKBU">name="EKBU"<br>
name="EKdocType"<br>
name="EKdocOwner"<br>
name="EKdocTech"<br>
name="EKpostDate"<br>
name="EKreviewDate"</h2>

<p>Spotted in the source code of various pages at <a
href="http://kodak.com/">Eastman Kodak</a>, these <code>META</code> tags
are probably used by Kodak's proprietary authoring and indexing systems.
They're completely useless to anybody who doesn't work for Kodak.</p>

<h2 id="Formatter">name="Formatter"</h2>

<p>Apparently, this was used by early versions of Microsoft FrontPage, in
place of (or in addition to) <var>Generator</var>.</p>

<p>Reference: none</p>

<h2 id="Generator">name="Generator"</h2>

<p>The <code>content</code> for <var>Generator</var> is an unqualified
(freeform) text string identifying the software program that created the
tagged web page. I'm not sure which software first put this on a web page,
but I know it goes back at least as far as Netscape Navigator Gold 3.0.</p>

<p>Sadly enough, <a href=
"http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/arr/1998/oneill_etal/metadata.htm"
>one academic study</a> says <var>Generator</var> is the most common
<code>META</code> tag on the Web.</p>

<p>Reference: none</p>

<h2 id="GoogleRank">name="GoogleRank"</h2>

<p>This one was spotted by a poster at <a
href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/">Webmasterworld</a>. The clear
consensus is that anybody who uses <var>GoogleRank</var> has no idea how
<samp>META</samp> elements or <a href="http://www.google.com/">Google</a>
work.</p>

<p>References: <a
href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum3/13815.htm">Search Engine Forums:
META NAME="googlerank"</a></p>


<h2 id="IBM.country">name="IBM.country"</h2>

<p>Spotted on various pages at IBM.com. <code>Content</code> value is a
two-letter ISO abbreviation for the country, probably the country of authorship.</p>

<p>Reference: none</p>

<h2 id="Owner">name="Owner"</h2>

<p>Spotted on various pages at IBM.com; not to be confused with the
<code>http-equiv="<var>Owner</var>"</code> used by <a
href="proprietary.html#MOMspider">MOMspider</a>. Sometimes the
<code>content</code> is an e-mail address and sometimes it's an unqualified
name accompanied by geographic location. Presumed to be used by IBM's
internal indexing and maintanence systems.</p>

<p>Reference: none</p>


<h2 id="Microsoft-Border">name="Microsoft Border"<br>
name="Microsoft Theme"</h2>

<p>Used by Microsoft software for something, obviously, but I don't really care what.</p> 

<p>Reference: none</p>

<h2 id="revist-after">name="Revist-After"</h2>

<p>Another urban legend of <code>META</code> tagging, this value is
probably a mangled version of <a
href="proprietary.html#SearchBC">SearchBC's revisit tag</a>. Like
<var>revisit</var>, this tag is supposed to tell search engine robots how
often to recrawl a page. Also like <var>revist</var>, this tag doesn't
work.</p>

<p>One clear sign that this tag isn't real: The sites recommending it can't
agree on the the <code>content</code> syntax. Some say it's a whole number
indicating the requested re-crawling interval in days, while others say the
words "days" needs to appear after the number.</p>

<p>The other clear sign that this tag is worthless? Nobody can conclusively
cite an engine that obeys it (except for <a
href="proprietary.html#NetInsert">NetInsert</a>, who treats is a synonym
for <var>revisit</var>). So there.</p>

<p>Reference: none</p>

<h2 id="Section">name="Section"</h2>

<p>This tag was used by <a
href="http://www.state.ak.us/local/akpages/ENV.CONSERV/home.htm">Alaska
Department of Environmental Conservation</a> to identify which department
program was responsible for the tagged page. They seem to have stopped
using this tag.</p>

<p>Reference: <a
href="http://www.state.ak.us/dec/das/is/webcord/htmstand.htm">DRAFT
Standards for web documents on DEC's website</a></p> 

<h2 id="Security">name="Security"</h2>

<p>Spotted on various pages at IBM.com, always with the
<code>content</code> value of <var>public</var>. Presumbably, anything with
a different <code>content</code> value isn't meant for public consumption.</p>

<p>Reference: none</p> 

<h2 id="SHOE">http-equiv="SHOE"</h2>

<p>This tag indicates that the tagged web page uses the Simple HTML
Ontology Extensions. So far as I know, no software ever implemented those
extensions, so I'm declaring this tag useless.</p>

<p>The value of <code>content</code> indicates what version of <acronym
title="Simple HTML Ontology Extensions">SHOE</acronym> is used in the
page.</p>
 
<p>Reference: <a
href="http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/plus/SHOE/spec.html#Compliance">SHOE
1.1: Indicating a SHOE-conformant Document </a></p>

<h2 id="Source">name="Source"</h2>

<p>Spotted on various pages at IBM.com, with various <code>content</code>
values. The <code>content</code> value appears to refer to a design
template used for the tagged page, so this <code>META</code> tag is
probably used by some authoring software.</p>

<p>Reference: none</p>

<h2 id="Template">name="Template"</h2>

<p>Used by various Microsoft authoring products to identify a predesigned
template used to build the tagged page.</p>

<p>Reference: none</p>

<h2 id="ThemeName">name="ThemeName"</h2>

<p>Used by Go Daddy Software's Website Complete authoring
software to identify which set of theme templates the page author used.</p>

<p>Reference: none</p>

<p class="advert"><!--#exec cgi="../adverts/ad_2.pl"--></p>
<!--#exec cgi="../cgi/menu.pl"-->
<!--#exec cgi="../cgi/2002"-->
</BODY></HTML>
